![\"\"](\"https:\/\/scienceofthetime.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/facebook1-300x210.png\")
<\/p>\nGovernance should be all about being future oriented. A substantial amount of future-literacy is helpful then, though generally speaking this competence is not very institutionalized in politics and government. Furthermore, As the clich\u00e9 goes, we are living in times of exponential change. Furthermore, It makes governance-as-a-future-oriented preoccupation even more urgent. However, it isn\u2019t easy\u200a\u2014\u200adiverted by so many pressing delusions of the day politicians are. Furthermore, Some themes here:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
During job interviews asking for sexual<\/strong>, political<\/strong> or religious<\/strong> preferences, let alone for potential<\/strong> pregnancies<\/strong> is forbidden by law, as it reeks like discrimination. However, meticulously researching some one\u2019s social media behavior on his beliefs, her looks etcetera isn\u2019t bound by any rule. Furthermore, Should we keep it that way?<\/p>\n When you want to visit a website but refuse the accompanying cookies you are out and can forget entering. Furthermore, Is such a razor-sharp choice between opt-in and opt-out reasonable, in the era of the indispensable worldwide web<\/strong>. Isn\u2019t the choice like a collective strangling gesture? Where are the politicians to raise the question? When I visit a hotel and they ask me to pay and extra amount for the oxygen I will use in my room, I think this utterly unreasonable. Furthermore, Even though I could opt for not breathing anymore. Isn\u2019t the worldwide web not our virtual oxygen?<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/scienceofthetime.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/charity.jpg\")
<\/p>\nFuture Outlook and Cultural Impact<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/scienceofthetime.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/1352058944685412198.jpg\")
<\/p>\n